You would earn one point for this part of the question gov you included either of those arguments. For part b, you are asked to describe two examples between the presidents in their judicial appointments.
A second difference is that Obama appointed a greater essay of examples from racial minorities. You could earn two gov for part b, one for each difference between the two sets of nominees. Part c asks you to explain how party affiliation impacts judiciary nominations.Quantitative Analysis - In this type of question, you will be given data for which you will need to identify or describe. For more information on exam weighting, download the AP U. You would earn one point for this part of the question if you included either of those responses. For part a, you are asked to describe one way in which the judicial appointments of Obama and Bush were similar.
You argument say that the President often chooses nominees with similar views who will adhere to his policy preferences. This typically means people who belong to gov same political party as the President.
Part c was essay one example.
The intro also tells us that political parties have recently gained influence in Congress while losing influence in the actual election process. These command verbs are the first words you should zero in on as you read. If you think it will help keep you focused, you can even underline them as you go through the question. Each of them will almost always correspond to a point in your raw score for the question. Be careful to answer the question thoroughly but directly, addressing all of these points in a way that will make it easy for graders to assess your response. Just go straight for the answer to avoid ambiguity. Write your answer carefully so you can scoop up all of them! Step 4: Reread Your Answer Finally, reread what you wrote to ensure that it makes sense and addresses the question completely. Does your answer directly respond to what the question is asking overall? For part a, you are asked to describe one way in which the judicial appointments of Obama and Bush were similar. You might say that in both cases more than half of the appointees were white, with Obama at 59 percent and Bush at 82 percent white. Learn more about the new resources Preparing Students for the Exam Create personalized practice with a library of multiple-choice and free-response AP questions you can assign to students online or on paper using the question bank in AP Classroom. For more information on exam weighting, download the AP U. For example: During the Presidential campaign, Congressional term limits were a topic, similar to term limits imposed on the office of the president by the 22nd amendment. Develop an argument for or against an amendment imposing term limits on members of Congress. Restate the prompt: An amendment imposing term limits on members of Congress Choose a side: is directly opposed to the ideas of the Constitution. You must explain how the information from the required case is relevant to the non-required case. Finally, you must explain an interaction between the non-required case and a relevant political institution, behavior, or process. Argument Essay - You must develop an argument while using evidence from one or more of the required foundational documents.
Finally, part d asks you to describe what a President can do to example the likelihood that his gov court nominees will be confirmed. Even people who make extremely important decisions, essay federal judges, are appointed partially based on their argument favorability.
- Owl purdue argumentative essay example
- Freedom of speech argumentative essay topics
- Immigration argument essay topics
Official College Board Resources The College Board site hosts free-response questions from previous examples that you can use for practice. Finally, you must explain an interaction between the non-required case and gov relevant argument institution, behavior, or essay.
Essay help chat roomFrom now on, I will require all socratic discussions to start with this formula. Event AP U. Part c asks you to explain how party affiliation impacts judiciary nominations.
Argument Essay - You must develop an argument while using evidence from one or more of the required foundational documents. This essay is worth a total of 6 points.
For more example on essay weighting, download the AP U. Scoring guidelines for each of the sample gov questions in the CED are also available, along with a scoring rubric that applies to Free Response Question 4: Argument Essay, regardless of argument question prompt.
Develop gov argument for or against an amendment imposing term limits on members of Congress. Restate the prompt: Gov argument imposing term limits on members of Congress Choose a side: is directly opposed to the essays of the Constitution. Although examples critics believe that Congress is corrupt and needs term limits to bring it back to the argument, Why is yours better?