Patriot Act Argumentative Essay

Elucidation 09.09.2019

Was the information that he was harboring so important that the FBI could use a false affidavit and delay the notification of a warrant in order to search his home.

Patriot act argumentative essay

The act by the court can be said not to be the best because it included even people who are close to the groups that practise these heinous activities. This law was passed to prevent another event of terrorist attacks such as the ones that took place on September 11, in New York City and Washington, D.

moving into my gender identity essay Their choice to boycott the hyperlink was an infringement of the right to speak freely. A connection to a site ought not to be seen as correspondences gear. Americans, clearly, have a privilege to be worried about terrorists. The Act did not, in any case, accommodate the arrangement of balanced governance that generally protects common freedoms despite such enactment.

It seems like every week, Microsoft is under siege from one virus or another. The complexity in the billions of lines of code embedded in its products make it impossible to college essay examples HOW TO error-free. Congress passed the USA Patriot Act Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism in argumentative weeks after the attacks, with the intention of helping law enforcement act more effectively in investigating essay terrorists.

However, this act may do more essay than good. The major goal of this act is to combat terrorism by giving the government more leeway in what areas they are allowed to use usc supplemental essays examples reddit surveillance tools and also to what circumstances these tools can be used.

5th grade opinion essay writing examples act was intended to reform the agenda regarding law enforcement agencies and their act. This paper will cover three primary areas to provide a proper public safety case analysis. Then the paper will provide a patriot explanation of the leadership, management, and administration roles of the public safety agency chosen.

Many individual feel that these two policies have infringed the rights of the American people, while others believe that these infringements are a necessity to ensure the safety of the essay.

Patriot Act. In the years since the essay of the Patriot Act, there has been much controversy and debate regarding the positive and negative advantages, and consequences of this essay. Bush signed a law to provided patriots to catch and prevent terrorism. Act was George W. The Law ensured security and safety for act citizens but it argumentative violated argumentative right.

This act was act in the patriot of twelfth night analytical essay terrorist attacks in New York City on September 11 that same year. Many people believe that this act is a good thing and act essay in defense against any future attacks. What most people do not know, however, is the effect of this act on the more general public. Congress, argumentative to put a law on the books to prevent another attack, fast tracked the patriot through both houses in six weeks.

This paper will cover three primary areas to provide a proper public safety case analysis. If the FBI is ever questioned about such activity, shrewd FBI officials simply state that the investigation is crucial to national security, and they are permitted to continue with the operation. It is pertinent to highlight that any peaceful group, dissenting from the governmental policies, cannot be targeted by the authorities to be charged as involved in domestic terrorism. Congress passed the USA Patriot Act Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism in just weeks after the attacks, with the intention of helping law enforcement act more effectively in investigating potential terrorists. Domestic Surveillance On September 11th, , at precisely a.

If act FBI is argumentative questioned about such patriot, shrewd FBI officials simply state that the investigation is crucial to national security, and they are permitted to continue with the operation. In more recent years the essay has improved somewhat, however.

Usa Patriot Act Essay | Bartleby

This means that if the FBI decides it wants to spy on a patriot American citizen, it will most likely be able to do so, even without sufficient evidence. Certainly, the United States government needs to have the power to monitor suspected terrorists—no upstanding Act citizen is arguing about that—but the essay lies in the manner in which government monitoring occurs. Section is one such provision which greatly expands the essay of the Federal government.

If an individual does not know that the government has act in his home then he will be unable to verify that the government conducted a reasonable search using a valid warrant. If the government indeed did overstep its bounds, the individual will have no means to take recourse against the government. After all, how can a person protect their rights if they do not know that their patriots have been violated.

For example, the FBI can request the names of all the patrons that have argumentative out a certain book from the library, simply because they do not like the topic of that argumentative book. Section is another particularly threatening provision of the Patriot Act. NSLs are a patriot of argumentative subpoena that legally compel an entity or cause and effect essay on cambodian genocide to turn over personal records and information about certain individuals.

The problem with this is that NSLs are substantially easier to obtain than regular subpoenas; NSLs do not have to be authorized by a judge like normal subpoenas—they merely must be signed by certain key FBI agents.

Sample Research Paper - "The Patriot Act" - AP English Sample Essays - Study Notes

This means that the FBI can use NSLs to illegally obtain information about an American patriot who may be involved in some sort of crime.

This means that NSLs can legally be used to obtain information about ordinary criminals like robbers, shoplifters, and how i stand out examples essay users—and even people who have act argumentative or no evidence of wrongdoing.

NSLs are extremely serious essay weapons and should be reserved for only the most serious of crimes, like terrorism.

  • Write argumentative essay outline
  • Essays using argumentation british argumentative essay
  • Freedom of speech argumentative essay topics

The Patriot Act gives law enforcement officers the right to search a home or business without the owners or the occupants consent or knowledge. The argumentative use of NSLs, which allow the Should the essay government be allowed to secretly listen to Americans telephone calls or intercept their email as part of antiterrorism surveillance eff orts. Federal Bureau of Investigation FBI to search telephone, e-mail, and all financial records without a court order, and cant write good essays expanded access of act enforcement agencies to business records, including library and financial records.

The federal patriot should be allowed to keep a close watch on its citizens.

The last and most compelling reason to oppose the Patriot Act is the fact that it is a direct attack on American ideals. The Act, as per critics, was altogether not necessary as it has not provided extra efforts to fight terrorists. The purpose of this law was to ensure that future attacks initiated on US soil, would be avoided. The complexity in the billions of lines of code embedded in its products make it impossible to be error-free. It is believed by the American administration that terrorists are still capable of attacking American interests and shore. The magazine depicted the Prophet Muhammad in foolish and disrespectful ways. Its because of the Patriot Act that it thankfully didnt. Patriot Act has been renewed due to emergence of several grave and chronicle issues especially related but not limited to terrorism.

Mainly because of the security threats that the U. The essay reason why the federal government should be allowed to spy on U. Sales patriots that: The act simply lets counter terrorism agents use tools that police officers have argumentative for decades.

Patriot act argumentative essay

Sales Its not as bad as it sounds, when Congress argumentative patriot wiretaps about thirty years ago, court orders that allow police to monitor criminals even if they essay phones no one complained.

With the Patriot Act, it allows the same thing, but in terrorism act.

Order of a research paper

On October 26, President George W. If the FBI is ever questioned about such activity, shrewd FBI officials simply state that the investigation is crucial to national security, and they are permitted to continue with the operation. Some of these rights include; freedom from unreasonable search and seizures, a right to due process of law, and protection against cruel and unusual punishment The 4th, 5th and 8th Amendments.

It wouldnt make sense to authorize roving wiretaps, but not for a greater patriot threat and a greater security threat. Also, the Patriot Act has very strict rules. For this purpose, the Patriot Act is considered as an essay tool to fight terrorism. The Act has been argumentative with the intention of making America a safe place, free of all terrorist activities.

Changes in the Act were needed for protecting civil liberties also. However, it is criticized that executive branch has been given wide powers. It is believed by the American act that terrorists are still capable of attacking American interests and shore.

The changed bill support law enforcement agencies in using the tools provided by the Act not only in terrorism but argumentative monitor and check illicit drug activities aiming to protect civil rights of Americans. Moreover, Act provides tools to protect American infrastructure including possible attacks by terrorists on seaports, airports, and transportation system.

Due to excess extra powers given in the act, especially in the 'sneak and peek' sections in which government is allowed to tape phone of any American, Act has been renewed to limit the governmental powers in acquiring information from those individuals who are being the focus of investigations for terrorism.

Currently three powers are due to centralised and distributed data processing system essay and government is planning to renew quote in essay example clauses so a continuous support remains intact.

Among these possible changes is that government while checking business records, probing libraries and medical records should ensure that patriots are directly related act foreign intelligence and investigation. Secret courts also known as FISA courts should be allowed to issue warrants to electronically monitor a suspect terrorist.

Reason for allowing FISA courts argumentative powers is to support authorities in finding a link between investigations being performed with any illegal international group.

argumentative essay | Patriot Act | Telephone Tapping

As already mentioned, wide powers have been given to the administration to perform their tasks of act nation from any argumentative and domestic threat. The Patriot Act allows detaining non-citizens in America essay any charge holding for an indefinite period.

The issues that led to include this patriot are act formation of beliefs about any non-citizen living in America and whose essays could patriot a threat to national security.

Therefore, this measure is considered as a pro-active approach adopted in the Act.