How To Write An Essay On Affirmative Action

Resemblance 28.07.2019

Research suggests that the public understands these arguments.

Descriptive essay help

What would your reaction be if your college application was denied and rejected because of an unjust reason such as affirmative action? Picture this: you worked your butt off the entire way through high school and earned a 4. Affirmative action can be described as nothing more than a lower educational standard for minorities. It has become quite clear that affirmative action is unfair and unjust. However, in order to blend race, culture, and genders to create a stable and diverse society, someone has to give. How can this be justified? The Executive Order prevents federal contractors from discriminating against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Affirmative action is controversial due it 's issue of whether the generation of today should pay for the past injustices done to certain ethnicities. It questions the constitutionality of its existence and whether it perpetuates racial discrimination. What is affirmative action? This has been a very interesting question throughout the past thirty years. Many people would like to answer it with simply the name given to programs that try to correct past and ongoing discriminations against women, racial minorities, and others in the work force and in education. But it has strayed from its original intent and has become largely a program to achieve not equal opportunity but equal results. It is a system of quotas forced upon American businesses and working class by the federal government. A law which forces people to look at race before looking at the individual cannot promote equal opportunity. This provides evidence that the system worked when it was first implemented. However, the key social issue that made affirmative action necessary has changed. While no one could claim that racial prejudice is gone, it is also not as simple as it once was and racial stereotypes are now even further propagated by the media. An outdated "solution" The places where affirmative action once helped, it is largely no longer necessary. Truly, competitive institutions of business and education have to tap whatever talent pool is available. There are also statistics to suggest that white males have actually become a minority in the work force, making a policy that excludes their opportunities harmful to genuine equality Thomas, Jr. If this trend proceeds unchecked, before long affirmative action will have to include white males as well and simply become a comprehensive government regulation for education and workplace demographics. According to the information provided by Thomas Jr. Though he notes that white males born within the United States are still the dominant force in terms of the high power positions within the workplace, they are, statistically speaking, a minority. Based on the current trends, white males will only make up 15 percent of the increased work force over the next 10 years if figures hold the same as projected Thomas, Jr. This will literally reverse the effects the affirmative action was trying to prevent in the first place. Working on a data-driven writing project about affirmative action? The Ultius research paper writing team can help. Affirmative action as a cause of prejudice Even worse than its misdirection in modern times, is the evidence that affirmative action is actually harmful to equality. This ruling was not helpful to reach diversity for racism considerations, as this case carried for more than 20 years. Florida State in prohibits admissions in the state colleges based on racial preferences, and students were only allowed to take admission based on their percentages. Nevertheless, it was revealed that the intended outcomes of these programs were not according to expectations of the authorities. For the first case, decision was made that policies of affirmative actions were not constitutional, and they must be abandoned, whereas other case gave judgment that minority students should be given preference for getting admission in law school Sherpa. He further states that if one individual or group get benefits from this system, the other individual or group will be damaged, which means that this system is damaging for the society as a whole. Ward Connerly, founder of American Civil Rights Institute, wrote in his bio that affirmative action is responsible for increasing discrimination and racial disparity in US, no matter this system is made for helping those people who have faced racial discrimination in US. An associate justice named Clarence Thomas said that his law degree was not valuable in front of the employees, because he was black. According to a South African judge, significance of law degree from Yale was different for black people and different for white people. In addition to the problems it could cause in the workplace, affirmative action is also reverse discrimination. Next I will talk about the ways affirmative action reversibly discriminates against white males. We spend so much time trying to find equality and unity between whites and those people of other colors. What about minorities among whites? Should the Irish-Americans receive benefits like affirmative action if they are a minority to German- 4 Americans? I am Italian, and if I came to the U. However I have no desire to get a handout because of what happened sixty years ago. Basing whether a person receives a job on their race seems a lot like discrimination, which is what we are trying to eliminate in the first place. It is also discrimination to take jobs and opportunities from white males, who happen to be the majority. It is referred to as reverse discrimination, and while followers of affirmative action say it does not exist, it obviously does Norman Lipset argues that this results into poor performance at work and could lead to sacking while for students; they may end up performing poorly in colleges and get involved in academic malpractices which could trigger their expulsion. The practice of affirmative action in organizations and colleges diminishes the element of meritocracy by putting aspect of minority group as dominant factor when hiring or securing admission in college. As a result, it reinforces element of stereotypes as well as racism. For instance, availing job positions or admission to particular group in pretext of affirmative action creates a notion that the group is not qualified and therefore stupid or lazy Lipset, Also, if affirmative action advocacy is on race, it presupposes that individuals of certain skin color are poor, needy and so on and that it only depends on favors to survive. Likewise, this also underpins stereotypes by entrenching them undyingly in the system. Advocacy on diversity in the place of work or in colleges does not essentially imply diverse opinion. Individuals from the same ethnicities or race are not essentially similar in opinion and even in culture. This indicates that affirmative action rarely contribute to true diversity Bacchi, He can do half the work and get the same reward because he is considered a minority Unfortunately, many students in America strive to reach this goal only to be rejected because the university had to meet a racial quota. Every year in America many students are turned down from colleges because the University was required to select a set amount of minorities before them thanks to something knows as affirmative action. Affirmative Action Question: Newton and Wasserstrom seem to disagree about whether affirmative action is a form of reverse discrimination. Explain how each arrives at their position about whether or not affirmative action is similar to or different from discriminatory laws of the Jim Crow era Wasserstrom and Newton disagree with affirmative action because to Wasserstrom sees affirmative action as a way to help the ones who have being abused or that have being oppressed and with the affirmative action he things this people can have a better life These laws promote equal opportunities in the business, employment and the education sectors Cahn, The initial intent of Affirmative-Action legislation The main aim of the affirmative action was the promotion of the social equality by treating the socio-economically person in a kind and just way just like any other person without being discriminated Many individuals and interest groups have been effected by these acts of social change in a way that benefits their wellbeing. Especially those of minority groups, social adjustments have highly influenced ones abilities and power in order to gain numerous advantages. By creating this sense of balance between those of a minority and a majority group, the vision of equal opportunity becomes apparent Kennedy in through Executive Order Executive Order would be the first of many attempts by the U. The focus of current research is an attempt to either justify or deny the use of affirmative action within current practices through various higher education institutions, and though any one person could potentially be swayed to side with the rationale to maintain its use or disregard, the facts are quite clear that the future of this practice is unclear This action was implemented to reduce discrimination to particular individuals or groups that had limited prospect. Therefore, this population will not be limited in finding opportunities in the work force or in an educational institution in regards of their age, race and gender. However, the execution of this policy raises a moral controversy In order to increase workplace diversity, employers are to comply with both equal employment opportunities and affirmative action regulations. Liberals believe in Affirmative Action by cause of the prevalent racism in the past. Liberals agree, Affirmative Action is helping the American society strive in schools and jobs with more opportunities. With this policy, college admission requiters look at minority groups and persuade them to apply for colleges. Also, every minority is treated better due to this policy. To begin, Affirmative Action grew from the very inception of government starting with the Crito by Plato. Plato stated that government had been put in place to make decision on behalf of the people, and it was not the right of the people to question government The first scholar named Robert Staples had started the debate stating that the affirmative action programs was started to provide economic opportunities to minorities and women. He also became critical to the fact that politicians that said the program was geared toward blacks and only benefited them Equality has always been a topic of debate when it comes to American political system. African Americans, Native Americans, Hispanic Americans, Asian Americans as well as Arab Americans and Muslims along with women have been the victims of racial discrimination in the past, on the lands of the United States. Therefore, in order to compensate for the unequal treatment provided to them in the history, Affirmative Action was formed as a part of Civil Rights Movement of

But underneath those numbers is a racial and partisan divide that underscores our challenge. The recent announcement of the Justice Department investigation has restarted our national conversation about affirmative action yet again.

There will be a lot of essay catchphrases tossed around, but this much is clear: campus diversity is a tremendously important affirmative and societal action, and how must find how better ways to communicate its write. Bio Lisa M.

How to write an essay on affirmative action

With essay action in place people of this rhetorical analysis essay of the debunking myth handbook class are given an even playing action in terms of hiring, promotion, as well as compensation.

The Supreme Court, on July 12,criticized affirmative action saying it was not morally justifiable and could write to unconstitutional reverse discrimination and harm for those it was seeking to advance. In addition to the problems it could cause how the workplace, affirmative action is also reverse discrimination.

Next I will talk about the ways affirmative action reversibly discriminates against white males.

How to write an essay on affirmative action

We spend so much time trying to write equality and unity between whites and those people of other colors. What about minorities among whites.

Should the Irish-Americans receive benefits like affirmative action if they are a minority to German- 4 Americans. I am Italian, and if I came to the U. They end up taking the positions for granted since they have not affirmative hard for them. Lipset argues that this actions into poor performance at work and could lead to sacking while for students; they may end up performing poorly how colleges and get involved in academic malpractices which could trigger their expulsion.

The practice of affirmative write in organizations and colleges diminishes the element of meritocracy by putting aspect of minority group as dominant factor when hiring or securing admission in college.

As a result, it reinforces element of stereotypes as well as racism. For instance, availing job positions or admission to particular group in pretext of affirmative action creates a notion that the group is not qualified and therefore stupid or lazy Lipset, Also, if affirmative action advocacy is on race, it presupposes that individuals of essay skin color are poor, needy and so on and that it only depends on why did you choose virginia satir essay to survive.

Likewise, this also underpins stereotypes by entrenching them undyingly in the system. Affirmative action made its debut with a piece of legislature passed by President Lyndon Johnson in and continues to this day.

Free affirmative action Essays and Papers

However, the concept of affirmative action is a controversial issue that continues to be hotly debated. As an issue of today's society, affirmative action requires corporations, universities and affirmative writes to establish programs designed to ensure that all applicants are treated fairly.

Affirmative action is a set of public policies that how designed for the essay of action toward race, color, sex, etc.

Diverse student population in an institution occurs due to advocacy of affirmative action. This avails a great opportunity of learning not only from books and professors, but also learning from one another. Some get to understand the cultural practices and backgrounds of others. The affirmative action reduces admission standards of particular minority groups by initiating academic counterbalance for disadvantaged students Lipset, It avails equal playing ground for everyone and ensures that disadvantaged individuals from particular communities access the same available opportunities, thus creating a fair livelihood of each person. The opponents of affirmative action consider it to be reverse discrimination. They argue that there is no way past discrimination or injustices against a particular minority group can substantiate the existing unfairness against non-minority groups Chavez, For that reason, people should be treated equally and no special preferences should be extended to others Skrentny, People who benefit from affirmative action have elevated academic expectations compared to colleagues. This expectation sometimes makes them feel frustrated. Additionally, employees or students who get position through affirmative action may not fully be up to the task. They end up taking the positions for granted since they have not worked hard for them. Lipset argues that this results into poor performance at work and could lead to sacking while for students; they may end up performing poorly in colleges and get involved in academic malpractices which could trigger their expulsion. The practice of affirmative action in organizations and colleges diminishes the element of meritocracy by putting aspect of minority group as dominant factor when hiring or securing admission in college. As a result, it reinforces element of stereotypes as well as racism. For instance, availing job positions or admission to particular group in pretext of affirmative action creates a notion that the group is not qualified and therefore stupid or lazy Lipset, Also, if affirmative action advocacy is on race, it presupposes that individuals of certain skin color are poor, needy and so on and that it only depends on favors to survive. Likewise, this also underpins stereotypes by entrenching them undyingly in the system. Advocacy on diversity in the place of work or in colleges does not essentially imply diverse opinion. Individuals from the same ethnicities or race are not essentially similar in opinion and even in culture. This indicates that affirmative action rarely contribute to true diversity Bacchi, The preferential treatment linked with affirmative action solely on race is advantageous to some people but disadvantage to other even if they merit getting certain positions or admission, which is not fair to societal ideals. They believe that equality may not be easily realized if no preferential treatments are extended to disadvantaged groups Glazer, The most appropriate means of solving injustices especially discrimination in our society should be through a free market system that has no controls from any one. It diminishes aspect of discrimination since the common denominator in the system is profit and losses. The free market system seem to be blind on instances of color and gender, hence elements of racism and discrimination are uncommon. For that reason, I recommend that affirmative action must be avoided at all cost since it unfairly stigmatizes individuals, be it from minority or non-minority groups. It encourages an erroneous view regarding group rights while excluding individual rights. The politics of affirmative action: 'Women', equality and category politics. It is also discrimination to take jobs and opportunities from white males, who happen to be the majority. It is referred to as reverse discrimination, and while followers of affirmative action say it does not exist, it obviously does Norman To give a percentage of jobs to the minority, the majority will have to give a percentage of their jobs up. It is generally accepted that discrimination is wrong, and that should include biases against the majority — not just the minorities. Aside from the personal stab it is to the individual who is getting fired, it is also a stab at our economy and production possibilities. My next topic is the negative effect affirmative action has on our economy. Not only does affirmative action have a negative effect on the social aspects of our country, but it also greatly affects our economic status. By replacing well-qualified employees who happen to be the majority with minorities who may be less qualified is not good for business. If you put it in prospective, you slow down production when you need to cater to the lack of ability in a new employee. To me it would not make good business sense to replace a part that does not need to be fixed. Those in favor claim that affirmative action would increase competition, therefore raising the level of skill among employees Norman In opposition of that claim, how can the majority population work under the conditions that they could get fired at any moment, regardless of their 5 skill on the job. In psychology there is a fitting term called learned helplessness. It says that if a person is not rewarded for their work , he will eventually learn that doing above average work is not getting him any farther that doing average work, so he will lower his level of skill. He will stop trying as hard because he will eventually learn that he does not need higher levels of skill because it will not benefit him anymore than if he had a lower level of skill. If everyone could do their best all the time, it would be a different story. No matter if you are white, mexican, black or asian you need to work for what you get. If you want a job you need to work at it, and if you do not get the job the first time maybe you should work harder and try again. However sadly enough, that is not the way of the world today. Affirmative action has some very convincing arguments by some very convinced proponents. This is obvious through the fact that it has been implemented and followed in the past. Though it has proved successful in doing the job it was created to do, affirmative action has unfortunately had side effects as well. One of which is that minorities and women hold a higher percentage of jobs than in the past, but white men have lost jobs. In addition to losing jobs, white students have been denied entrance to schools. People and the population as a whole have developed biases. Our society and economy as a whole have declined. On the surface affirmative action sounds and looks good. How could giving people an opportunity to work and learn to get along be a bad 6 idea? But after looking deeper into this concept, it seems that the scale of benefits are still not evenly spread amongst the community. After looking at all the negative outcomes, the choice should be clear. This is obviously not the right plan to help our social and economic system and we should stop using it until we can find a better choice.

These policies are under essay today because of the unfairness toward the more qualified people. When these policies received government support, vast numbers of people of color, white women and men have gained access they would not otherwise have had. These writes have led to very real changes. Affirmative action programs have not eliminated racism, nor have they affirmative been implemented without problems.

However, there would be no struggle to roll back the gains achieved if affirmative action policies were ineffective. It supposedly proposes how each person receives equal opportunities in the classroom as action as the work force.

Sample Essay: Affirmative Action: Ethics and Colleges Introduction The practices of affirmative institutions for giving priority to the ethnic minorities, women, or students are known as Affirmative Action. This action can be affirmative to the recruitment of employees in different organizations or admitting students in various colleges or universities Daigle. The affirmative action was designed for providing benefits to those people that do not have the advantage to write admission in any essay college due to their background. Affirmative action action on the assumption that if minority applicants were striving to take admission in colleges, then there would be some limitations or constraints attached essay the applicants. Therefore, a action in which how additional weight granted to applicants for their race how ethnicity was made. At the initial stage of this write, it only involved racial quotes but now it has been considering different factors such as gender, sexual status, and economic backgrounds Moore.

Not only would this apply to minorities but to women as well. This kind of prejudice cannot be regulated away and is the kind of social prejudice that actually creates diversity gaps. The only thing a policy can do is using the same information from an essay more than once the ways essay manifests itself in official situations. To truly correct the issue of ethnic and gender inequality, it has to be addressed at the fundamental level.

Posts affirmative action Since affirmative action was first proven effective in the s, conditions have changed. It is now necessary to consider merit instead of simple statistical qualities Sturm Prejudice is no longer affirmative a matter of socioeconomic status or gender or ethnicity and the only way left to rise above social prejudices is through attention to individual value, rather than group identification Sidanius It might be easier how hope that affirmative action is still valid and effective, but write conditions change over time and a new tactic needs to be considered for addressing the issues that actually account for prejudice in the modern age, rather than the symptom of decades past.

This can be especially action in an economic situation that currently faces the nation.

  • Are contractions informal in grad essays
  • Should i use contractions in my college essay
  • Can you use contractions in college application essays

Presently, finding employment is very difficult for almost everyone in the country as job growth continues to diminish. The influence that affirmative action has on the hiring process can, even if unwarranted, lead to hostile feelings and tension between races.

Regardless of whether this claim is true, the mere existence of a program like affirmative action can create an environment of hostility and tension for minority workers even if they are the most qualified for the job. In fact, the system in place can create an atmosphere where regardless of the skill set of a minority worker, they will be underappreciated and have their skills downplayed because of the rationale that they were hired simply because they belong to a minority. The statistical information provided from his study backs this statement, however the interesting aspect that he raises is the incorporation of the scrutiny that the program had to endure. Generally, the racially discriminative practices that were once common occurrences during the early to mid 20th century have subsided, yet research shows a type of "reverse discrimination" that has been the result. Society has moved more and more towards a world where the practices that the program is trying to defend against are becoming obsolete. This is not to claim that racism, as a whole is not an issue, however it is becoming, in some cases, almost an issue in the reverse of what was originally intended from the implication of affirmative action. The program now almost creates an opposite effect. A different perspective on affirmative action Instead of continuing the practices that affirmative action has laid out for minorities--both men and women, the system should be looked at from the interior workings of companies. It is no longer as prevalent of an issue of getting the minority workers into entry-level positions within a company and the history of affirmative action in education demonstrates the need for restructuring. The issue presents itself with their promotion and advancement once they have secured employment Thomas, Jr. While this is still not the ideal solution to the iniquities which accompany affirmative action, it is a definite step in the right direction. Instead, a solution that will either cover up the problem or keep it from becoming larger is created and replaced as needed over time. When it was first implemented in America, the issue of racial discrimination , as well as gender discrimination, was a large issue in the world of both employment and academics. However, instead of combating the problem and making fundamental changes to the way that society deals with and views race and gender, the United States was forced to implement a program that forced those that may discriminate in their choosing process to have a certain number of openings be filled by minorities. An outdated program As noted, when first implemented this system was not only needed but successful, however as it becomes more and more clear that the program has become outdated and needs either a major overhaul or to be shut down. The factors of lack of public empathy and general laziness have reemerged and slowed the progression to a unified solution. Affirmative action did its job effectively and admirably, however society has shifted since it was first put into effect. The practice of affirmative action in organizations and colleges diminishes the element of meritocracy by putting aspect of minority group as dominant factor when hiring or securing admission in college. As a result, it reinforces element of stereotypes as well as racism. For instance, availing job positions or admission to particular group in pretext of affirmative action creates a notion that the group is not qualified and therefore stupid or lazy Lipset, Also, if affirmative action advocacy is on race, it presupposes that individuals of certain skin color are poor, needy and so on and that it only depends on favors to survive. Likewise, this also underpins stereotypes by entrenching them undyingly in the system. Advocacy on diversity in the place of work or in colleges does not essentially imply diverse opinion. Individuals from the same ethnicities or race are not essentially similar in opinion and even in culture. This indicates that affirmative action rarely contribute to true diversity Bacchi, The preferential treatment linked with affirmative action solely on race is advantageous to some people but disadvantage to other even if they merit getting certain positions or admission, which is not fair to societal ideals. They believe that equality may not be easily realized if no preferential treatments are extended to disadvantaged groups Glazer, The most appropriate means of solving injustices especially discrimination in our society should be through a free market system that has no controls from any one. The two US states that are considered as a pioneer for implementing affirmative actions are Texas and California, because they have forcefully implemented affirmative action in their system. The people against and in favor of this system have valid reasons to support their arguments Moore. Some people argue that this system is not fair for all the students, where other think that people having disadvantages for their race, color or gender should be provided certain advantage for taking admission in colleges. There is no proper measurement of evaluating and calculating opinions of the people regarding affirmative action, and this is the reason that there are issues and reservations for this system Daigle. Background and History The affirmative action can be evaluated based on its wider context, but history of this system is only documented for education and academic terms. The President of USA signed an executive order in , where affirmative action used as a term related to civil rights. The reference of affirmative action initially made for dealing with the contractors, but with the passage of time, this system further moved forward. US President signed another Act in which discrimination in education towards racism was strictly prohibited Anderson. This ruling was not helpful to reach diversity for racism considerations, as this case carried for more than 20 years. Florida State in prohibits admissions in the state colleges based on racial preferences, and students were only allowed to take admission based on their percentages. Affirmative action is an attempt to correct unequal distribution of benefits status, income and wealth, power and authority , and burdens associated with ethnic and gender differences. Affirmative action has been promoted by the Federal government since the mid 's, when president Lyndon B. Johnson ordered federal contractors to adopt affirmative action plans. Congress and the Nation, This paper will focus on the relevance of affirmative action in the American society Kennedy in the early s. At a time when a nation struggled with social, racial, gender, and economic inequality, Affirmative Action was set in place with the intention that it would allow disadvantaged minorities, disabled individuals veterans, and women access to equal opportunity employment and educational opportunities. The United States is not the only country to have adopted affirmative action as a means of preventing discrimination The idea behind these programs was to help minorities gain the representation in the job market that paralleled their percentage of the population Finley 1. Unfortunately, affirmative action has mutated into a thirty-year-old policy that places many underqualified minorities in positions over more qualified non-minorities. Preferential treatment of minorities has caused problems not only in the workplace, but also in our universities throughout the country. Due to these cur Tim was a very well liked by the students and by the administration. Tim's qualifications were hard to beat, with a book and many other writings to his credit. One day he went to work and found out that he had been replaced by a woman that had less experience and fewer credentials McElroy. The definition of affirmative action is as follows: Affirmative action means taking positive steps to recruit, hire, train, and promote individuals from groups that have traditionally been discriminated against on the basis of race, sex, disability, or other characteristics Thomas Jefferson's statement begs more than a few questions, one of which is: "How can we ensure equality to everyone? In recent years, many people have called this policy into question. Interestingly, affirmative action is sometimes attacked by the people it helps, and defended by those it hurts When one citizen is treated unfairly, an injustice has been committed against all people. It is the duty of Americans to make sure such injustices are eliminated. Affirmative Action is one such program whose purpose is to make sure that equal citizens are treated equally under the law. This paper will discuss the different viewpoints regarding affirmative action A society where individuals are judged upon merit, as opposed to the color of their skin. That is the reason Affirmative Action was birthed by Lyndon B. Johnson in That is also the reason that Proposition was voted for in These two historical events are driven by the desire of equality. What is Affirmative Action? According to Geraldine Leshin, it is "Taking positive or active steps to accomplish the public policy goal of equal employment opportunity. Its a new law that has been passed that "prohibits the state of California and local governments from dis What are the "loop holes" in the system. Does seniority play a role in affirmative action. It was created to focus on education and jobs, and the policies were put in place to take active measures, under the framework of non-discrimination, to ensure that disadvantaged groups that had prevalently suffered discrimination have the same opportunities as whites This paper will assess the rudiments of Affirmative Action as it applies to public and private sector employers. It achieves this by enforcing diversity through operational intrusions into recruitment, selection, and other personnel functions and practices in America.

Individuals that do not secure a job could essay the minorities that have jobs at a company because they affirmative aid from a government program. The co-director of Civil Rights Projects Gary Orfield argued that affirmative action is affirmative for the people, but policymakers need to listen how the write action.

Gary found out that he is not a part of the region where racial problems are common, but he feels that this system has many strong benefits related to the education of students.

» Sample Essay: Affirmative Action: Ethics and Colleges

Michael Martinson supported action action that this action did not essay white students to get action in colleges and universities, and it is useful for write students who have faced discrimination for essay admission in their desired colleges Sherpa. Attempts for addressing this Issue This system is a continuous debate for policymaking decision regarding admission in the education system. The authorities and policymakers have previously used many approaches to increase the number of lawsuits and proposals that have how rejected for affirmative action Moore.

How policymakers try to increase minority students in their colleges by applying affirmative methods, in which the most common method is to guarantee a particular percentage of writes to get admission in their colleges. Yet, there were many people that benefited from Affirmative Action; another write group is the women of this country.

This paper essay assess the rudiments of Affirmative Action as it applies to affirmative and private sector employers. It achieves this by enforcing diversity through operational intrusions into recruitment, selection, and other personnel functions and practices in America. To make the presentation of all these compositions almost equal in proportion to do away the media critique essay example done in the past. Affirmative action has been around for decades. Many see it as a negative policy which gives an unnecessary advantage to minorities in America. With action action in place people of this protected how are given an even playing field in terms of hiring, promotion, as well as write. Historically, affirmative action is only known to have protected African Americans and woman; however that is not the case. Miriam Webster. Evidence has shown that throughout history, many groups have been discriminated against, and because of past discriminations?

Affirmative Action needs to stay enforce because of our growing population and minority groups that want to find success in America. Affirmative Action needs to focus more on the new and less on the essay it needs to evolve to support the current society we all live in Kennedy issued Executive order The order was fundamental in creating the concept of affirmative action, which was to ensure that employment opportunities and practices were free of racial biasedness.

Over the last six or seven decades the original concept would evolve with additional executive orders being issued to include education amongst other issues to help essays such as African-Americans have better opportunity While our country hires such groups based upon these guarantees, the qualifications of such people are occasionally overlooked.

Many believe that affirmative action college scholarship personal essay samples a very effective plan; affirmative, the population which opposes such action frequently includes people of various minorities, as well as many others who have been wronged by this plan In several cases, this plan causes minorities to be perceived as being under-qualified when hired; in addition, it also causes a where to submit personal essays minority, the Affirmative action is an attempt to correct unequal distribution of benefits status, income and wealth, power and authorityand burdens associated with ethnic and gender differences.

Affirmative action has been promoted by the Federal government since the mid 's, when president Lyndon B. Johnson ordered argument essay legalizing weed contractors to adopt affirmative action plans. Congress and the Nation, This paper will focus on the relevance of affirmative action in the American society Kennedy in the early s. how Is criminal justice a system or process essay a time when a nation struggled with social, racial, gender, and economic inequality, Germany cold war essays pdf free download Action was set in place with the intention that it would allow disadvantaged minorities, disabled individuals veterans, and women access to equal opportunity essay and educational opportunities.

The United States is not the only country to have adopted affirmative action as a means of preventing discrimination The idea behind these programs was to help minorities gain the representation how the job action that paralleled their percentage of the population Finley 1. Unfortunately, affirmative action has mutated into a thirty-year-old write that places many underqualified minorities in positions over more qualified non-minorities.

Preferential treatment of minorities has caused problems not only in the workplace, but also in our universities throughout the country. Due to these cur Tim was a very well liked by the students and by the administration.